History

Historically, accreditation and licensing bodies have varied in terms of the length of the reappointment. While some have followed the Joint Commission requiring a 2-year (not to exceed than 24 months) reappointment cycle, others have required a 3-year (not to exceed 36 months) reappointment cycle. The Joint Commission (founded in 1951) is the nation’s oldest and largest standards-setting and accrediting body in health care.

However, the Joint Commission is not the only standards-setting body for health care accreditation. Organizations such as the DNV, NCQA, ACHC (formerly known at HFAP), HRSA, AAAHC, and others offer accreditation to hospitals, ambulatory care centers, networks, behavioral health facilities, and federally qualified healthcare clinics.

A comparison of current accreditation and licensing standards for the reappointment cycle can be found in the chart below:

 

 

Rationale for the Change

In September 2021, the National Association of Medical Staff Services published a position statement on the reappointment cycle articulating how a change to a 3-year reappointment cycle would allow the medical staff professionals (MSPs) to re-assess practitioner performance in a more efficient and effective manner and ultimately ensure patient safety.

Formerly a 2-year cycle, the 3-year practitioner-reappointment cycle would align with health plans’ recredentialing schedules and enable MSPs to perform ongoing professional practice evaluation (OPPE) more effectively on credentialed and privileged practitioners.

Some Things to Consider Before Transitioning to a 3-year Reappointment Cycle:

  • Bylaws
    • Any reference in paperwork or sections that speak to membership, privileges, committees, corrective actions, definitions.
    • Credentialing policies and procedures (length and what vetting occurs at which intervals).
    • Other documents:
      • Governing board documents
      • Employment contracts
      • Affiliation and service agreements
      • Other med staff documents (app forms, reference letter, rules and regs, dop’s, peer review, etc.)
  • Operational Considerations
    • How to transition to the new timeframe? Depending on the reappointment cycle of the facility, a methodical transition can take up to 3 years to complete.
  • Other Considerations
    • CMS CoPs Surgical Privileges 2 years, how would you handle that with a 3-year reappointment? Processes are needed to implement the CMS 2-year surgical review/update requirement in conjunction with TJC/ACHC 3-year reappointment.
    • OPPE Process needs to be established and robust in its process. Performance data has to be reviewed with an extended reappointment timeframe.
    • Medical Staff Dues
      • Increase?
      • Decrease?
      • Assess dues more frequently?

Summary

The standards for reappointment have historically differed. Recently, the 3-year reappointment cycle is becoming more mainstream with the accreditation agencies. However, all facilities accepting Medicare reimbursement for services are required to meet the CMS Conditions of Participation. The current Conditions of Participation (CoPs) recommend reappointment every 24 months.

Facilities should also make note of CMS CoPs regarding surgical privileges. Although CMS does not have specific requirements (but rather a recommendation) for reappointment/privileging cycles, it does have specific requirements for surgical privileges. The current CMS Interpretive Guidelines §482.51(a)(4) state that surgical privileges should be reviewed and updated at least every two years.

Please note that organizations taking federal Medicare funding that switch to a three-year reappointment time cycle, will be required to adhere to the state laws and may be obligated to review and update surgical privileges every two years. (Kansas and Missouri) 4 Revised 7/31/2024 The transition to a 3-year reappointment cycle will take time as facilities that have traditionally reappointed every 2-years will need to consider their medical staff bylaws, policies and procedures, and other considerations.